Skip Navigation LinksHome > - News > The Tiny Silver Market, Part 3 ~ Jason Hommel
Bill Murphy Bix Weir bullion fraud CFTC deflation derivatives dollar devalued dollar value Eric Sprott free food GATA gold gold bull gold/silver ratio Hugo Salinas Price Hunt Brothers hyperinflation industrial use of silver investing IRA James Turk Jeff Lewis Jeff Nielsen Jeff Nielson JP Morgan Lew Rockwell Lindsey Williams Mineweb Peter Schiff precious metals QE Quantitative Easing rare earth metals Retirement Plans Road To Roota short positions silver silver bull silver conductivity silver purification silver test silver/gold ratio Stephen Leeb stock market

The Tiny Silver Market, Part 3 ~ Jason Hommel
The Tiny Silver Market Part 3
(Over the Counter, "Other Precious Metal" Derivatives, explained by the BIS!)
Jason Hommel
October 6, 2009

I first reviewed the tiny size of the silver market. Investors purchase about $1 billion worth of silver per year. (Tiny Market, Part 1)
A few days later, I highlighted the BIS OTC Derivatives for "other precious metals", which revealed a notional amount of $111 billion, which is about 111 times larger than the annual investment demand for real physical silver. (Tiny Market, Part 2)
Fortunately for all of us, a man who read my articles took action, and emailed the BIS, and asked some good questions, which revealed some good answers.
First, I will admit that much of the discussion on how the BIS counts the figures is over my head. But for those who question the validity of the numbers it is instructive to note what the BIS does say, at the first link in their answer, paragraph II under, "coverage".
"All published figures are adjusted for double-counting resulting from positions between reporting institutions."
That means the figures are more accurate than some might think.
It is also important to note the distinction between the notional values, and the gross values, both of which are listed at the BIS data charts for OTC derivatives, here:
The notional value is the value based on the actual metal underlying the contract. So a silver contract, either a futures contract or an option, for 5000 oz, at $17/oz., would have a notional value of $17 x 5000 = $85,000.
The gross value is dependent upon the price paid for the contracts, so if you could buy such a contract for about 10% down, and get 10:1 leverage, the gross value would be more around $8500.
Unfortunately, the BIS states that they don't think the notional values represent true risk. This is unfortunate, since the notional values might represent only a fraction of the true risk.
For example, if a short position requires only $8500 to initiate, which "controls" $85,000 worth of silver at $17, and if silver prices double, then the liability on the short side is 100% of the notional value.
But if silver runs to $170/oz., then the short side liability is 9 times the notional value!
Remember, the notional values in the silver market are somewhat close to the $111 billion figure, the difference being platinum. Clearly, they sold way more silver than exists. If they have to cover that, or deliver that, then they could push the silver price more than ten times higher than today, so the potential silver liability could well exceed $1 trillion.
Oh yes, a man emailed me today, wondering why I'm not commenting on why silver and gold are making this breakout move. Hello? It's everything I'm talking about. The fundamentals. People are waking up to the fact that the real silver market is a $1 billion market, and the fraudulent silver market is $150 billion, and the fraudulent "money" markets are $400,000 billion. That realization is enough. China buying, too. Whatever. The silver market is tiny, too small to accomodate significant buying, without the price moving up. That's what a "small" market means. Price must go up.